Blogger Hell

Finally, after all these years.  Black Hole Theory is dying.  It’s true!  And what else is going with it? Erroneous applications of the theory of relativity!  Don’t take my word for it.  Go out there and look and see for yourself.  Go to Google.com and punch in “E=mc2 is wrong” and then search for “E=mc2 is right” and you’ll see a very obvious difference.  It seems that by popular vote E=mc2 is no longer a quick make-you-sound-smart token you can just drop into any conversation.  Instead, you might get laughed at by people who know better.

Just ask The Hammock Physicist to name one of many people who are on the up-and-up when it comes to modern understanding of nature.  Take a look at a recent article by Johannes Koelman that explains how E=mc2 is wrong:

http://www.scientificblogging.com/hammock_physicist/whats_wrong_emc2

Oh and did I mention that Einstein was a plagiarist?

What’s the deal with Black Hole Theory?  Well its always been like Swiss cheese.  Full of holes.  A theory about holes full of holes? How can this be?  Try asking the astrophysicists and arm chair scientists what they think.  You may find a whole heap of speculation that results in no practical future for the theory.

First you have to ask yourself, “Why does this matter at all?”  We can start by going back to when Albert Einstein developed his theories of General and Special Relativity.  At some point Einstein was doing experiments in his head and he must have had a bad dream (my nightmare) and came up with the concept of a black hole.  All of these because he imagined gravitation so strong that it swallowed photons.  Then on top of that, we are lead to assume, that photons are the most powerful particle (or substate of matter) in the Universe!  Yet they aren’t more powerful than the folding of space that occurs near a black hole.  By the way, black holes have never been discovered.  They were invented and then searched for, but we’ve never found any.  Why?  There’s no verified laboratory proof that any evidence hasn’t ultimately disproved the theory!  What the heck am I saying?  People are going on popular belief that black holes are some kind of real thing out there.  To me, its just as real as the boogie man.  No, I’m not talking about home invaders.  I’m talking about make believe which is just what I think black holes are.  A pretty scary figment of Einstein’s imagination that, instead of testing or critically thinking about like he did, a whole lot of morons have consistently urged the uneducated masses (people who think they are educated but are only repeating what they heard) to believe without question that black holes are real.

I hear this a lot, “Black holes are a commonly accepted theory, so you should write a book about it if you want people to care.”  Really?  I’ll have you know that I am writing a book about it.  First, however, I am going to complete my scientific paper on the psychological phenomenon of the perpetuated lie of black holes.  It’s really that bad.  Then I will write a book about how that paper is received.  And in that book I will specify how good I felt when in 2004 Stephen Hawking admitted to being wrong about black holes for some thirty years.  I called bullcrap on the whole idea when I was 11 years old.  Some 16 years later, here I am, still calling bullcrap and I have plenty of backers.

For me, black hole theory has been the biggest and most successful charlatanism to invade physics.  It’s so well in trenched in the minds of physics occult underlings that they have no idea that their masters who propose such outrageous, erroneous and highly speculative concepts, don’t even believe in black holes themselves.  Why do they lie to everyone?  It must be because they are lining their pockets with cash.  Think about it.  I’m just as much a black hole expert as everyone else who claims to be one, even the guys with degrees on the subject.  How can this be?

Don’t fret about it.  It’s not a big deal anyway because black holes don’t exist.  If they did exist we’d have a very different Universe than what we have today.  The present requirement by the black hole farce is that they are in the center of every galaxy and that is why we even have galaxies.  Curious.  I thought maybe gravity had something to do with it?  Or do we need an infinite mass point singularity to have any kind of attraction between anything to create a phenomenon such as swirling galaxies of stars?  If so, why aren’t we seeing the explained effects of these black holes?  How come when I look at the center of the galaxy I don’t see a big black streak that goes from the black hole’s location all the way back to the point in the Universe where it was formed?  Isn’t there supposed to be some kind of trail that a black hole leaves behind that is warped space?  We don’t see any warped space when we see the center of the Milky Way.  All that we see there are very fast moving stars in very hot gas.  Unfortunately, most of the proponents of black hole theory, seem to claim that a pivot point in the middle of the galaxy is proof of an infinitely dense point-mass called a singularity, or better known as a black hole, which is really an event horizon that surrounds a singularity.  And again, we have never found any singularities or event horizons in the Universe.  All that we have seen is hot stars and where we can’t see there is darkness. If we had better eyesight would we see more light and less darkness?

I’m being hypothetical, however, that is what you need in order to understand black holes.  Wouldn’t we have discovered very obvious indicators of their presence?  I’m not buying the presented so-called evidence that is force fed to us by media.  Good thing there is the Internet, because it allows for all of us critics to get together and expose the charlatans.  I’m very skeptical of anyone who claims black holes are real and exist somewhere.  That is akin to claiming dragons are real and exist.  We know dragons don’t exist, we may have some things that look like dragons but they are not dragons.  A dragon is to a dinosaur as a black hole is to a very heavy star.

There is no hole.  There is a whole, but not a hole.

You might be wondering where is the evidence that disproves black hole theory.  Well my first evidence was when I tried to imagine any of the black hole theories proposed.  They just aren’t possible because they cannot be imagined.  What’s worse is since no one has discovered a black hole it becomes even harder to describe something we’ve never found.  It is a complete waste of time.

I’m not the only one who thinks black holes are unreal.  Take a look at Ricardo Carezani’s work in Autodynamics.  His theory of does away with relativity in the classic sense, eliminates undiscovered hypothetical particles like the neutrino and proposes that gravity be understood as a particle.

http://autodynamics.org/

Another fellow who is hard pressed to imagine black holes are real is Stephen J Crothers.  This man is sharp. He knows his physics.

http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/

There you have it.  Four men who don’t believe in black holes (and one who wants to make up for fibbing for three decades):  Stephen Hawking, Stephen J Crothers, Ricardo Carezani, Johannes Koelman.

Who else?

5 people like this post.

Unlike